[the immediately below remains as yet unpublished: 9.20 am Monday 27/8
There were no other items published by The Oz: Merely Geoff Seidner VS Adrian Jackson]
##################################################################################################################################################################
From: g87
Conspiracies Destroyed
Adrian Jackson Letters 27/8 defends a variation of the League Of Rights attack on Jews: insisting that the late, unlamented Eric Butler apparently merely loathed ''Jewish financial interests'' and was ''principally concerned with Christian interests from a Christian orientation.''
I doubt whether any Christian deity would defend him. And Jackson's weak cliche of ''sour grapes'' does not hide the fact that my friends Rupert Murdowski and the esteemed late Kerry Pacanowski will / would not take kindly to his oblique attempted insults.
This is the way the League of Rights are: if they are not into conspiracies about Jewish domination - financial and otherwise, then it is their successors the CEC who accuse the Queen being a drug runner, invert meaning of words into conspiracies [synarchist: see wiki definition confirmation] and generally ensure that intelligent people eschew conspiracies.
They have a lot to answer for - the JFK conspiracy may not get off the ground today.
The 'best' ones are laughed out of existence.
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove East St Kilda 3183
Adrian Jackson Letters 27/8 defends a variation of the League Of Rights attack on Jews: insisting that the late, unlamented Eric Butler apparently merely loathed ''Jewish financial interests'' and was ''principally concerned with Christian interests from a Christian orientation.''
I doubt whether any Christian deity would defend him. And Jackson's weak cliche of ''sour grapes'' does not hide the fact that my friends Rupert Murdowski and the esteemed late Kerry Pacanowski will / would not take kindly to his oblique attempted insults.
This is the way the League of Rights are: if they are not into conspiracies about Jewish domination - financial and otherwise, then it is their successors the CEC who accuse the Queen being a drug runner, invert meaning of words into conspiracies [synarchist: see wiki definition confirmation] and generally ensure that intelligent people eschew conspiracies.
They have a lot to answer for - the JFK conspiracy may not get off the ground today.
The 'best' ones are laughed out of existence.
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove East St Kilda 3183
03 9525
9299
03 9525 9290
Antisemitic Organisations in Australia | B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation ...
The Australian League of
Rights (ALR) ... The Citizens
Electoral Council of Australia
(CEC), is the Australian arm of the
U.S. based Lyndon LaRouche extremist ...invert
words
The 1930's Synarchist assault on Australia
Synarchism
From
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Synarchism is
a term which generally refers to "joint rule" or "harmonious
rule".
Beyond
this general definition, however, both "synarchism" and "synarchy" have been
used to describe several different political processes in various contexts. Increasingly, the terms have been
used by conspiracy
theorists to mean rule by a secret elite.[1]
############################################################################################################
My letter published in The Australian 27/8/12
Eric Butler's views
The adjudication is more accurate in stating that I complained that Butler's views "were inaccurately portrayed as primarily anti-Semitic when in reality they were principally concerned with public service from a Christian orientation".
My unpublished letter had specifically focused on the injustice of Adams's claim that Butler's "favourite theme" was "the evils of the Jewish race".
An anomaly of the adjudication is its report that The Australian admitted that such might indeed not have been Butler's favourite theme. It is hard to see why the council did not accept that as vindication of that part of my complaint.
Your onslaught on Butler and the council smacks of sour grapes. It also looks like a shield for those Jewish financial interests that were Butler's real target, not the Jews generally.
Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic
..................................................................................
YOUR journalists deserve commendations for showing what the League of Rights and the Press Council stand for. The council's idea that an opinion piece in effect has to take the form of a debate in the first instance, is asinine.
Moreover, the idea all opinions need equal merit and space in a rebuttal by aggrieved parties, is absurd. Both are inimical to common sense.
Geoff Seidner, St Kilda, Vic
######################################################################################
######################################################################################
No comments:
Post a Comment